Legal Opinion
Republic Insurance Co. v. Oakley
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
The plaintiff insurance companies brought this action to recover retaliatory insurance taxes, penalties and interest which they paid under protest; the Chancellor denied relief and the plaintiffs have appealed.
*449Each of the plaintiff companies is a Texas corporation that has been duly qualified to engage in the insurance business in Tennessee and has done so for a number of years; each of the companies writes primarily fire and casualty insurance and workers’ compensation insurance in Tennessee.
During the taxable years in question, 1974 through 1977, the state of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hilliard v. ParkTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Crown Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Board of Insurance Com'rs v. Prudential Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Republic Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Atlantic Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Valley Forge Insurance Company v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- ACE American Insurance Company v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- American Home Assurance Company v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- American Southern Insurance Co. v. State, Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.