Legal Opinion

Matter of the Application of Ralph A. Lillich

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 17, 1957No. Patent Appeal 6275Published

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of appellant’s application for a patent on a pipe union on ground of lack of invention over the prior art. Claims 2 and 5 are typical of the appealed claims and read:

“2. In a union, a pair of flat faced pipe receiving sections, means for maintaining said sections in abutting relation, a groove in the abutting end face of one of said sections, the mouth of said groove being reduced in width, a rubber o-ring adapted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re StattmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re LippoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. In re KingstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. In re TaylersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API