In re Lippold
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJacksoN, Judge
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner, finally rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 to 18, inclusive, of an application for a patent, serial No. 441,637, filed November 11, 1947, “For Receptable Filling Device.” Two claims were allowed.
Claims 1 and 9 are illustrative of the involved subject matter and read as follows:
1. A valve for filling containers with fluid from an apertured reservoir comprising, in combination, a valve plug, an open-ended freely flexible resilient body having a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re StattmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re CarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- In re GriswoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re LillichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Edwin W. MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Loumiet Et LavigneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Matter of the Application of Ralph A. LillichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957