Legal Opinion

In re Lippold

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1949No. 5611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacksoN, Judge

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner, finally rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 to 18, inclusive, of an application for a patent, serial No. 441,637, filed November 11, 1947, “For Receptable Filling Device.” Two claims were allowed.

Claims 1 and 9 are illustrative of the involved subject matter and read as follows:

1. A valve for filling containers with fluid from an apertured reservoir comprising, in combination, a valve plug, an open-ended freely flexible resilient body having a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In re StattmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In re CarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. In re GriswoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re LillichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. In re MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Application of Edwin W. MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Application of Loumiet Et LavigneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Matter of the Application of Ralph A. LillichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API