Legal Opinion

Hapgoods v. Crawford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, James L. Crawford, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 24th day of January, 1908, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the fourth cause of action in the amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Houghton, J.:

The plaintiff is a business corporation and the action is for slander against it. The fourth cause of action alleged in the complaint, to which the defendant demurred on the ground that it fails *857to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, sets forth that the defendant was guilty of slandering the plaintiff in that he said that “ ‘ It (meaning the plaintiff) is composed of a lot of fakirs, robbers, thieves and business pirates, who are devoted to fraudulent practices, and take advantage of men when in their weakest position to extort money from them and give them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Associated Press v. HeathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adirondack Record, Inc. v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Neiman-Marcus Co. v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Cal-Therm Industries, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. McIntyre v. Bakers For A Democratic UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Isaacs v. Pan American Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API