McGinn v. Utah Power & Light Company
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from an order granting a new trial after a no cause of action judgment had been entered in a personal injury case, where, under provisions of Idaho’s comparative negligence statute, 1 stipulated to by the parties as being controlling, the jury returned a special verdict concluding that plaintiff was 60 per cent negligent and defendant 40 per cent negligent, which, under such provisions, would preclude recovery by the plaintiff of the damages arrived at by the jury in a certain amount.
Plaintiff received severe burns when an aluminum mast on a sailboat he was aiding in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Holland v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Argo v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Gardner v. GermainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Woodward v. HaneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.