Legal Opinion

Bartholet v. Berkness

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1971No. 42619PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered after denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial in a third-party action by which defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Roger Berkness and Albert George Petrie, Jr., unsuccessfully sought to impose upon third-party defendant, Dairyland Insurance Company, judgment for any liability established in an action brought against said defendants by plaintiffs, Mardonna A. Bartholet and Frank T. Bartholet. The issue turns upon an interpretation of the term “member of the same household,” as used in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Knuth v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Rydstrom v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gibson v. CallaghanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Cicciarella v. Amica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Van Overbeke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Bartlett v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API