Legal Opinion

Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 23, 2003No. 2:02-cv-02010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendants Long Island Care At Home, Ltd. (“LIC”) and Maryann Osborne (“Osborne”)(collectively “Defendants”) move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Evelyn Co.ke (“Coke” or “Plaintiff’) opposes the motion and also moves for the circulation of a Notice of Pendency and a Consent to Joinder to similarly situated persons pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). This Court heard oral arguments on April 2, 2003.

At issue is whether certain regulations promulgated by the Department of Labor (“DOL”)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. CokeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Evelyn Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd., and Maryann OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Evelyn Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd., and Maryann Osborne, Docket No. 03-7666-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API