Legal Opinion
Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 30, 1994No. Civ. 93-0162(SSB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is-denied.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In August 1987, New Penn Motor Express (“New Penn”) hired plaintiff Thomas Kube (“Kube”) as a “city driver” at its Cinnamin-son, New Jersey terminal. Plaintiffs Brief (“Pl. Br.”), at 1; Defendant’s Memorandum (“Def. Memo”), at 5. From November 1987, Kube worked as a ten-percent on-call city driver. Pl. Br., at 1; Def. Memo, at 5. This position involved driving, making pickups and deliveries, and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Laresca v. American Telephone & TelegraphDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Morris v. Siemens Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Nieves v. Individualized ShirtsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Leonard v. Metropolitan Life Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.