Legal Opinion

Olson v. Union Central Life Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This action was brought to set aside a foreclosure by advertisement; to cancel and avoid the notes and mortgage securing the same on which the foreclosure was predicated; and to recover on account of payments claimed to have been wrongfully exacted.

The facts are substantially as follows: The defendant, Union Cem tral Life Insurance Company, has for many years loaned money on farm lands in North Dakota. Eaton & Eaton ore a copartnership having their principal place of business at Fargo. For a long time they have represented the insurance company in placing and looking’ after loans in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cumming v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Merchants National Bank v. ReilandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Emerson-Newton Implement Co. v. CuppsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gillmore v. MorelliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Disbarment of EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bosworth v. GreilingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Olson v. Union Central Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fitzgerald v. Union Central Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API