Windust v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceDonworth, J.
(concurring) — I concur in the majority opinion but wish to state my views on stare decisis in addition to what is said on the subject therein.
The original workmen’s compensation act, adopted in 1911, defined “injury” as follows:
“The words injury or injured, as used in this act, refer only to an injury resulting from some fortuitous event as distinguished from the contraction of disease.” Laws of 1911, chapter 74, § 3, p. 349.
In Frandila v. Department of Labor & Industries, 137 Wash. 530, 243 Pac. 5 (1926), this court had occasion to construe the above quoted statute. There the workman, while…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rumsey v. New York & New England R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Olympia Brewing Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.