Legal Opinion

Wise v. Collins

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1898No. L. A. No. 296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Iny» County and from an order denying a new trial. W. D. Amot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

Action of replevin to recover two thousand four hundred sheep, or for two thousand five hundred dollars,. *149the value thereof, in case a delivery cannot be had. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Written findings were waived. Plaintiffs had- judgment for possession of eighteen hundred and twenty sheep, and if a delivery could not be had, for seventeen hundred and forty dollars, etc. John L. Collins, one of the defendants, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The first point urged in favor of reversal is based upon a ruling of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dye v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schnirring v. StubbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Shook v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  3. Siskin v. DembroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Bevis v. MurpheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API