Legal Opinion

Bevis v. Murphey

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1932No. Docket No. 8765PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced for the purpose of reforming a written contract for the sale of real estate, executed by the plaintiffs as sellers and the defendants as buyers. Judgment went for the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed.

That portion of the contract which it was sought to have reformed reads as follows: 1 ‘ Taxes for the current year to be paid by Seller and Seller agrees to pay all assessments levied subsequent to date hereof. Sept. 28, 1928." It is alleged in the complaint that “It was orally agreed between the plaintiffs and defendants that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winchester v. WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Blackledge v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Wise v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragland v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API