Legal Opinion
Frank Nali v. Thomas Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2012No. 09-1876, 09-1960PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Frank Nali was convicted by a jury in a Michigan state court on one count of extortion in violation of section 750.213 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Michigan courts affirmed his conviction and denied his request for post-conviction relief. Nali petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). The district court granted unconditionally Nali’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Joseph Hendrix v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Adams v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Drain v. WoodsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Adams v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Alward v. 22nd Circuit CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.