Legal Opinion
Cindy F. v. Berryhill
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 13, 2019No. Case No. 3:17-cv-2025-SIPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Cindy F. ("Plaintiff") seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act (the "Act"). For the following reasons, the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
The district court must affirm the Commissioner's decision if it is based on the proper legal standards and the findings are supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ;…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- (SS) Her v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (SS) Marez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (SS) Packard v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (SS) Siqueiros v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.