Captline v. County of Allegheny
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This appeal raises the issue of whether the principles governing the dismissal of civil cases for lack of prosecution apply to proceedings under the Eminent Domain Code. For the reasons that follow, we hold that such principles apply to claims alleging a defacto taking.
Appellants, Carol M. Captline and Equibank, N.A., are co-executors of the Estate of Mike Mazzaro. Since the 1960’s, Mazzaro owned 105 acres of land in Findlay Township, Allegheny County. The property was used as a landfill until the early 1970’s when the County of Allegheny directed Mazzaro to cease…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nicoletti v. Allegheny County Airport AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Barr Street Corp. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Blair v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Estate of: DiMatteo, A., Appeal of: DiMatteo, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Estate of: DiMatteo, A., Appeal of: DiMatteo, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.