Legal Opinion

Blair v. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA Justice.

We must determine whether this land use appeal was properly dismissed due to lack of prosecution. For the reasons that follow, we hold that principles governing the dismissal of cases for inactivity apply to proceedings under the Municipalities Planning Code. We further hold that, under the circumstances of the instant case, the failure of the Zoning Hearing Board to certify the record for appeal does not constitute a compelling reason for the delay in prosecution.

On October 2, 1989, Appellants, Richard Blair and Ingrid Morning, appealed a decision of the Zoning Hearing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Shope v. EagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API