Legal Opinion

City of Blue Ash v. Price

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 2018No. C–170347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deters, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal, plaintiff-appellant the City of Blue Ash, Ohio, challenges the trial court's decision made in a criminal proceeding brought against defendant-appellee Matthew Price in which the trial court held Blue Ash's toy-vehicle ordinance unconstitutional. The judgment of the trial court finding Price not guilty is not appealed. However, we determine that the trial court erred as a matter of law in declaring Blue Ash's ordinance unconstitutional.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} In October 2016, Price was riding on a motorized skateboard in a crosswalk…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Miller v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StargellOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Voorhees v. Anderson Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API