Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Judy Bond, Inc. & Kreindler
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
Petitioner employer moves to vacate an arbitrator’s award which directed it to pay $1 per dozen to respondent union for 61,100 dozen blouses manufactured for petitioner by nonunion contractors in violation of the collective agreement. Respondent cross-moves to confirm the award and for the entry of judgment thereon.
The contentions of petitioner are (1) that the provisions of the collective agreement sought to be enforced by respondent are illegal as violations of the antitrust laws, (2) that the contractual provision for liquidated damages of $1 per dozen is in fact a provision for a penalty,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Seidlitz v. . AuerbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Hackenheimer v. . KurtzmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Perma-Stone Bi County Corp. v. AckermanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Knoblauch v. Little Falls Dairy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- McKinley Associates, LLC v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Semico, Inc. v. Pipefitters Local No. 195Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Kreindler & Judy Bond, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Semico, Inc. v. Pipefitters Local No. 195Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976