Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2005No. 03-8059PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a routine traffic stop with the all-too-routine denouement, a drug conviction. But it has some troubling features: seeming reliance on the defendant’s selective refusal of consent as a basis for reasonable suspicion, apparent inconsistencies between the district court’s findings of fact based on the officer’s testimony and the video tape of the traffic stop, and relatively weak indicators of suspicious behavior. Nonetheless, doing our best to apply the standards currently prescribed by the Supreme Court, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTS

On January 13, 2003,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Alcaraz-ArellanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API