Legal Opinion

Aloia v. City of Washington

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1949No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

In this action of trespass, Mary Aloia, plaintiff, sued the City of Washington, a Municipal Corporation of Pennsylvania, for damages sustained when she fell as a result of stepping into a hole in one of defendant’s streets. After the court had overruled the preliminary objection of defendant that it had not received the required legal notice of the accident, and the jury had returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $6,000, the learned court en banc overruled defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial and entered judgment on the verdict.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. McGlinn v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Lutz v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Badger v. Upper Darby TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Henn v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reinoso, G. v. Heritage Warminster SPESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Bosack v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Breskin v. 535 Fifth AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Steele v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API