Legal Opinion

State v. Candler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1975No. 744SC1092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendants assign as errors, first, the denial of their motions for directed verdicts of not guilty, and, second, the failure of the court “to properly instruct the jury as to the value of circumstantial evidence.” We find no error in either assignment.

The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the State, was amply sufficient to require submission of the cases to the jury, and defendants’ motions, which we treat as motions for nonsuit, State v. Holton, 284 N.C. 391, 200 S.E. 2d 612 (1973), were properly denied.

The court correctly instructed the jury as-to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. HoltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API