Legal Opinion

State v. Holton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1973No. 53PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant by his first assignment of error contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty for the reason that the State failed to prove that Buford Ball, the alleged deceased, is actually dead. This contention is based upon the fact that no witness testified that he actually saw the dead body of Ball.

In a criminal case the proper motion to test the sufficiency of the State’s evidence is a motion to dismiss the action or a motion for judgment as in the case of nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. State v. Everette, 284 N.C. 81, 199 S.E. 2d 462…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. LouchheimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. DollarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. CarswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API