Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Grinnell Co. v. MacPherson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1957No. 6174PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The relators seek by prohibition to restrain the respondent judge from proceeding in a case pending before him in the district court of Bernalillo County, entitled “Larnie Schultz and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., plaintiffs, v. Grinnell Company, defendant,” and numbered 63,674 on the civil docket of said court. We granted an alternative writ upon the filing and presentation of the petition therefor and the matter is now before us in a test of whether the alternative writ was improvidently issued. It will be necessary to state the facts in order to ascertain this fact.

On…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tilley v. Keller Truck & Implement Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Empire Steel Corp. of Texas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
  4. Hill v. Zale CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cruttenden v. ManturaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API