Commonwealth v. Bockes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Appellant was convicted of adultery. The assignments of error are directed to two main questions: (1) Whether there was competent evidence that the defendant was a married man; (2) whether the charge of the court was adequate on the question of the marriage.(1) There was no attempt to prove the defendant’s marriage by any record, or by witnesses present at it. The wife was not even called to testify, though she lived in the county and was a competent witness to prove the marriage: Act of May 23,1887, P. L. 158, sec. 2 (b), as amended by Act of May 11, 1911, P. L. 269. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of MurdockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Bisbing's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Hunt's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
- Estate of GrimmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Balanti v. Stineman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Fitzpatrick v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- In re Estate of ZemmickBelmont County Probate Court · 1945