Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 7, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00074Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 LATIA ALEXANDER, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-00074-APG-NJK 8 Plaintiffs, Order 9 v. [Docket No. 37] 10 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to seal motion to modify stipulated 14 protective order and exhibits filed in conjunction with the motion. Docket No. 37. Plaintiffs 15 filed supplemental briefing. Docket No. 43. Defendants filed a response. Docket No. 44. The 16 motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. 17 There is a strong…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ervine v. Warden, San Quentin State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016