Legal Opinion

Unger v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed February 7, 1939:

Martin, J.

The errors assigned are that the court erred:(1) In denying the motion tO' quash the information;(2) In overruling the demurrer to the information;(3) In denying the motion fpr dismissal; and(4) In adjudging defendants guilty .upon, all counts of the information.

No' bill of exceptions having'been settled, the record is here without the evidence given upon the trial. We do not deem it necessary to separately discuss the assignment of errors. The decisive question is: Does the information state any offense or offenses? The gist of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dale v. PattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Dale v. PattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Spoo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Finsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Rosenberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. State v. UngerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API