Legal Opinion
Rozak v. American Red Cross Blood Services
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 8, 1996No. 3:96-cv-00471PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.. The. defendant moves to strike the plaintiffs jury trial demand on the basis of immu nity to trial by jury. For the reasons that follow, the court denies the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs jury demand.
I
In June 1994, plaintiff Michael Rozak was hospitalized and received a transfusion of blood platelets that he alleges were supplied by the American Red Cross Blood Services (“ARCBS”) and from which he alleges he contracted hepatitis. On May 20, 1996, Mr. Rozak brought a negligence action against the ARCBS in LaPorte County, Indiana…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Department of Employment v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of 203 Paper Bags, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrington v. AMERICAN NAT. RED CROSS ST. LOUISDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999