Legal Opinion

Foy v. Foy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1937No. Civ. 10064PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

An examination of the complaint discloses that plaintiff seeks in equity the vacation, for want of jurisdiction and fraud, of those portions of an interlocutory deqree of divorce which awarded the custody of the child of the parties to defendant and directed plaintiff to pay to defendant certain sums for the support of herself and child, attorney’s fees and costs. The following facts are alleged in the husband’s complaint and not denied in the wife’s answer. The parties had intermarried and had as the issue of their marriage one child. The wife had previously filed in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Clemens v. KinsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fagan v. FaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Mergenthaler v. MergenthalerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API