Legal Opinion

Transcall American v. Comtel-Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1990No. 89-1373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)(6), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a default judgment in the amount of $46,104.43. We affirm.

The record reveals that the plaintiff, Comtel-Birmingham, Inc., entered into a purchase agreement with Transcall American, Inc. ("Transcall"), whereby Transcall would purchase the assets of Comtel. Those assets included certain customer lists and provided that Transcall would pay Comtel a percentage of the revenues earned from the use of those lists during the period from September 1985 through May 1986. In 1988, Comtel filed suit against Transcall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. City of Daphne v. CaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Douglass v. Capital City Church of NazareneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PINKERTON SEC. AND INVES. SERV., INC. v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. PINKERTON SEC. & INVESTIGATIONS v. ChambleeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Adams v. BoylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Edwards v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API