Transcall American v. Comtel-Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)(6), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a default judgment in the amount of $46,104.43. We affirm.
The record reveals that the plaintiff, Comtel-Birmingham, Inc., entered into a purchase agreement with Transcall American, Inc. ("Transcall"), whereby Transcall would purchase the assets of Comtel. Those assets included certain customer lists and provided that Transcall would pay Comtel a percentage of the revenues earned from the use of those lists during the period from September 1985 through May 1986. In 1988, Comtel filed suit against Transcall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- City of Daphne v. CaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Douglass v. Capital City Church of NazareneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- PINKERTON SEC. AND INVES. SERV., INC. v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- PINKERTON SEC. & INVESTIGATIONS v. ChambleeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Adams v. BoylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Edwards v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994