R.P. v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
R.P., a minor, appeals an order of institutionalization following his adjudication as a delinquent. We remanded for entry of written findings of fact as required by Children’s Rule 22(d), and we retained jurisdiction. Judge James R. Blair entered written findings which we now find insufficient to sustain an order of institutionalization. Accordingly, we vacate the order of institutionalization and remand for further proceedings.
Alaska Statute 47.10.080(b) prescribes various alternatives available to a trial court when a juvenile is adjudicated a delinquent. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Kirkpatrick v. Aline D.California Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flores v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Flores ex rel. Galvez-Maldonado v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- P.R.J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
- R.N. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
- B.F.L. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.