Legal Opinion

Flores ex rel. Galvez-Maldonado v. Meese

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1991No. 88-6249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a class action challenging an INS policy that requires governmental detention of children during the pendency of deportation proceedings. That policy is now codified at 8 C.F.R. § 242.24 (1988). Detention is required unless there is an adult relative or legal guardian available to assume custody, even where there is another responsible adult willing and able to care for the child and able to ensure the child’s attendance at a deportation hearing. The INS acknowledges that the regulation is not necessary to ensure such attendance. It does not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ammons v. Washington Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Flores v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API