Flores ex rel. Galvez-Maldonado v. Meese
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a class action challenging an INS policy that requires governmental detention of children during the pendency of deportation proceedings. That policy is now codified at 8 C.F.R. § 242.24 (1988). Detention is required unless there is an adult relative or legal guardian available to assume custody, even where there is another responsible adult willing and able to care for the child and able to ensure the child’s attendance at a deportation hearing. The INS acknowledges that the regulation is not necessary to ensure such attendance. It does not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ammons v. Washington Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Flores v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991