People v. Aeid
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his statement to the police was involuntary because it was induced by their false representation that witnesses saw him going back to the bar where the crime occurred (see, People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11; People v Robinson, 201 AD2d 931, 932, lv denied 83 NY2d 875; People v Foster, 193 AD2d 692, 693, lv denied 82 NY2d 717; People v Hassell, 180 AD2d 819, 820, lv denied 79 NY2d 1050). “An examination of the totality of the circumstances surrounding defendant’s [statement] establishes that the [statement] was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. HassellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aeid v. BennettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002