Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division’s finding that defendant’s confession was voluntary, a mixed question of law and fact, is supported by evidence in the record and therefore beyond this Court’s further review (see, People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 477; People v Johnson, 40 NY2d 882, 883). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the four-year-old victim to give unsworn testimony after having conducted an inquiry outside the presence of the jury and determining that the child understood the difference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. NisoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re Jimmy D.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. CamachoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API