Legal Opinion

Bordeaux v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 29, 2014No. Appellate Case 2012-212349; 27457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

We granted certiorari in this post-conviction relief (PCR) action to review the Court of Appeals’ decision, which remanded for a determination of the lawfulness of Antonio Bordeaux’s sentence. Bordeaux v. State, Op. No. 2012-UP-284, 2012 WL 10841809 (S.C. Ct.App. filed May 9, 2012). The State argues the Court of Appeals erred because the unambiguous plea colloquy and imposition of sentence control over the ambiguous written sentence. We agree. It is clear Bordeaux pleaded guilty to first degree burglary, was sentenced within the legal limits for that crime, and in consonance with his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Silvio SpalloneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Devin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Talley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Boan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Tant v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. AlbertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. AlbertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API