Legal Opinion

Payne v. Ross

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1923No. 12146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff in error to recover taxes paid by it under protest. This appeal involves levy made for general road and bridge purposes which, added to levies made for other current expense, amounted to 4.75 mills. It is the contention of the plaintiff in error tha,t the levy in excess of four mills was excessive and illegal. This contention • is based on section 9692, Comp. Stat. 1921, which provides :

“In all counties, the total levy for current expenses of each county, city, town, township or school district shall not exceed in any one year the following: County levy…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Bristow Battery Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Franklin v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. ForbesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API