Legal Opinion

Edward Denike Tree Co. v. Butler

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 1, 1990No. 8093PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

This action arises out of the plaintiffs claim for the balance due on a promissory note, together with interest and reasonable attorney’s fees. The defendants have appealed from the judgment of the trial court which added interest to the judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 52-192a.1 We find no error.

*368The promissory note was dated April 28,1982, in the original principal amount of $82,559. The note provided for annual interest in the amount of 12 percent and reasonable attorney’s fees in the event the promissor defaulted on the note. At the time of trial the principal balance due was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Federal Aviation Administration v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Crowther v. Gerber Garment Technology, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Lee v. TufvesonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Gillis v. GillisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API