Legal Opinion

Akard v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1934No. 22997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The ad valorem taxes on the land in controversy were delinquent for the years 1919 to 1928, inclusive. Each year the treasurer would offer the land for sale for the delinquent taxes for the previous year, and each year, there being no bidder, the county would become the purchaser.

On November 18, 1929, W. S. Barrow bought a tax certificate for the delinquent taxes for the year 1924, and paid the taxes for 1927 and 1928, and had the same indorsed upon his certificate. Upon this certificate the treasurer issued to Barrow a deed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michie v. HaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Treese v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Hartsog v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leyh v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Warrior v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Colebrook Guaranty Savings Bank v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Stith v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Town of Marshall ex rel. Versluis v. CareyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API