Legal Opinion
Leyh v. Glass
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 20, 1973No. 44671PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice:
The question involved in this appeal concerns what constitutes omitted property as that term is used in 68 O.S.1971 §§ 2435 and 2439.
Leyh acquired certain real property prior to 1965. On the date of acquisition two residential buildings, which he rented to third parties, were located thereon. In 1965 the residential buildings were demolished, and an office building was constructed on the land. The office building was leased to a commercial tenant.
The County Assessor of Tulsa County assessed the real property at a value of $750.00, and the improvements thereon at a value of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davidson v. Franklin Avenue Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- People Ex Rel. McDonough v. Birtman Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Palmer v. Beadle CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Mueller v. Mercer CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Akers v. HintergardtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westward Look Development Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- County Board of Equalization v. State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Sunkist Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- STATE EX REL. TULSA CLASSROOM TEACHER'S ASSOCIATION v. Board of Equalization, Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Alaska Distributors Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- 1111 19th Street Associates v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.