Legal Opinion

Rusk v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1918No. 10,308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Clinton Circnit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action by the Kokomo Steel and Wire Company against Burton D. Busk and another. From the judgment rendered, the defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

1. This is a vacation appeal from a judgment for appellees in an action brought by appellee Kokomo Steel and Wire Company against its coappellee Clark and appellant, Busk. Appellant’s briefs were filed on July 29,1918, and on August 14,1918, within fifteen days after the expira*629tion of the time allowed for filing snch briefs, appellee Clark submitted certain “Objections to Becord and Briefs,” under $3 of the act of 1917 concerning civil procedure (Acts 1917 p. 523, §691a et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918), and also filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice thereof, as served…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BeallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Blaemire v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Blose v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Houck v. McCoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Wools and Another v. RebergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Schrieber v. Peoples Building & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API