Lannon v. Lannon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: This is a proceeding to enforce a judgment directing payment of support. Defendant’s claim that Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding is without merit. The State Constitution grants general original jurisdiction in law and equity to the Supreme Court (NY Const, art VI, § 7 [a]). Jurisdiction. of the Family Court is limited to certain well-defined classes of actions and proceedings (NY Const, art VI, § 13) and as to those, Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction (Matter of Seitz v Drogheo, 21 NY2d 181; Kagen v Kagen, 21 NY2d 532). Since the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kagen v. KagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Seitz v. DrogheoNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Maule v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Singer v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peck v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Haberman v. HabermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Barringer v. DonahueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Liebling v. LieblingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Curtis v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.