Legal Opinion
Seitz v. Drogheo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1967PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
In October, 1964, Evelyn and Joseph Drogheo entered into a separation agreement, which ultimately was followed by a dissolution of their marriage via a Mexican divorce. The divorce decree incorporated the parties’ separation agreement. Under the pertinent part of the agreement the husband was to pay $23 weekly to the wife for her support.
As of May 25, 1966 Mr. Drogheo was $376 in arrears under the decree. Mrs. Drogheo, thereafter, petitioned the Family Court, pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 466 of the Family Court Act, to enforce the support provision of the Mexican decree, and on June…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Langerman v. LangermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Moen v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- In re EichnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Sohn v. CalderonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Walzer v. WalzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State ex rel. Spence-Chapin Services to Families & Children v. TedenoNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Wertheimer v. WertheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.