Legal Opinion

In re Popovich

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1939No. 348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In the bankruptcy proceedings of Lubomir Popovich an order was entered in January, 1938, granting the bankrupt his discharge. Nearly nine months later a creditor, the present appellee, applied for vacation of the discharge on the ground of fraud, pursuant to section 15 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 33. The proceeding was initiated by an order to show cause directed to be served upon the attorney who represented the bankrupt in procuring his discharge. By affidavit he asserted that he appeared specially to challenge the validity of- the service and that his retainer by the bankrupt had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re IngraoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930
  2. In re MauzyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1908
  3. In re HowardDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1913
  4. In re MagwoodDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  5. In re MeyersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Werner v. Puente (In Re Puente)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1985
  2. Bear Stearns & Co. v. Stein (In Re Stein)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Keeffe v. NatalieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
  4. In the Matter of OrenduffDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Keeffe v. NatalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API