Legal Opinion

Island City Savings Bank v. Sachtleben

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1887No. 2362PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. Wm. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee against appellant to recover the balance of a bank deposit. Appellant denied that appellee had ever made any deposit with, it, and alleged in its answer that the transactions upon which appellant had brought this suit took place before it, the defendant company, was organized. The nature of this defense appears more distinctly from the facts as found by the court below, which we here copy in full:

“The Island City Savings Bank was incorporated with banking privileges by special law of legislature of June 20, ] 870, and its charter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mickles v. Rochester City BankNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. Chicago Set & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. McDaniel v. National Steam Laundry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API