Legal Opinion

Marathon Oil Co. v. Babbitt

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 30, 1996No. A93-0503 CV (JKS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Motions for Summary Judgment

SINGLETON, Chief Judge.

Marathon Oil Company (“Marathon”) brings this action seeking judicial review of an order directing it to pay additional royalties on production derived from land leased from the government. Docket No. 1 (appealing an order issued by the Minerals Management Service of the Department of the Interior (“MMS”) in Case No. MMS-92-0560-0 & G). 1 This Court has jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1361 and 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq. The only issue in this ease is whether the six-year statute of limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 2415(a) 2 applies to MMS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Apache Survival Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Madeline Ritter v. Mount St. Mary's CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. BacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  3. Fina Oil and Chemical Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Oxy USA, Inc. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API