Tyler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,
A single question is presented to us on this appeal: Should we further reduce the verdict and' judgment which plaintiff recovered? The verdict was $50,000. The court in banc, consisting of three judges, one of them the trial judge, reduced the verdict to $30,000.
Appellant in its brief states: “The verdict, as reduced to $30,000, is still grossly excessive, but defendant cannot suggest a fair basis for a further reduction under the testimony.” It asks us to order a new trial. The plaintiff, through her counsel at the Bar on oral argu ment and in her brief,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maselli v. StephensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Rebel v. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Brown v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Mashinsky v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Huey v. Blue Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- McClelland Et Ux. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946