Legal Opinion

United States v. Ford

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 5, 1925No. 15829-15831, 15914, 15915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARTRIDGE, District Judge.

This is a motion to exclude and suppress evidence. The defendants are charged with a violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et soq.), and the Tariff Act of 1922 (42 Stat. 858), and also with a conspiracy to violate those acts. As overt acts, the indictments charge that in pursuance of the conspiracy defendants loaded the steamer Quadra, at Vancouver, with a large quantity of liquor for delivery here. She sailed to a point opposite San Francisco, on the high seas, and, it is alleged, delivered to various smaller vessels…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  4. Church v. HubbartSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. (PS) Brown v. SEIU Local 1000District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PS) Warfield v. Solano County Public Defenders OfficesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Ochoa v. Von LintigDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API