Legal Opinion

Edmond Weil, Inc. v. Popper

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 6, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The first two sentences of section 51 of the City Court Act expressly provide that in certain actions in that court, service of the summons may be made without the State where an order to such effect has been procured. The third sentence of the section states that the provisions of law relating to the service of a summons on a defendant without the State in an action brought *685in the Supreme Court shall apply to such service in the City Court. But section 235 of the Civil Practice Act permits service without the State without an order in certain Supreme Court actions. If the third sentence of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edmond Weil, Inc. v. PopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Finn v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Pavone Textile Corp. v. SouffrontCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API