Pavone Textile Corp. v. Souffront

Without an order of the court permitting such service, the plaintiff served the defendant in Puerto Eico with a summons and complaint which called upon the latter to appear and answer within six days from the date of service. The service was made after property of the defendant in this State had been levied upon under a warrant of attachment. The defendant, a resident of Puerto Eico, does not urge that such service without an order is invalid (cf. Weil, Inc., v. Popper, 143 Misc. 684, affd. 236 App. Div. 775; Finn v. Chase National Bank, 176 Misc. 127); he does argue that six days’ notice is…