Legal Opinion

Spedden v. Norton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 1, 1930No. [No. 41, January Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The appellants are life beneficiaries of a trust created by the will of Robert M. Spedden, who died on April 1st, 1911. Among the assets of the trust are 183 shares of the capital stock of the Edmondson Realty Company, having a par value of $100 per share. A cash “liquidating dividend” of fifteen per cent, of the par value of the stock has been declared by the board of directors of the company, following other similarly characterized dividends aggregating one hundred per cent, of the par value of the stock, and the principal question for decision is whether the latest dividend of that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  2. Northern Central Dividend CasesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Quinn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Dividend CasesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Ex Parte HumbirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heyn v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Zell v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. Heyn v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API