Heyn v. Fidelity Trust Company
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Parke, J.,
filed a dissenting opinion as follows:
There are two fundamental questions on this appeal. The first is the meaning of Chapter 495 of the Acts of 1929; and the second is, Are the corporate dividends which are in controversy within the scope of the statute? The legislation is the first in Maryland on its subject matter, and the enactment is wholly found within a single paragraph:
305C. All rents, annuities, dividends and periodical payments in the nature of income, payable under the provisions of any will, deed or other instrument executed after the first day of July, 1929, shall, like…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- New York, Lake Erie, & Western Railroad v. NickalsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Stutsman County v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co. v. Territorial Board of Equalization of the Territory of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.